Secrets of the Anasazi


Why You Do Not Have (and Don’t Want) Enemy Ancestors

When I first visited Chaco Canyon in northern New Mexico I got a creepy feeling. Who were these people? The staff, mostly Navajo and not descendants of the original inhabitants of the site, said they were the Anasazi, a Navajo term meaning “enemy ancestors.” When I pressed for more answers, I was told they belonged to the Chaco Culture. They were Chacoans.

Anthropologists are used to calling people they don’t understand a culture, but as I learned more of this one I don’t think they had much of it. The culture of the Anasazi turns out to be one of head-hunting, terrorizing human slaves, drug use and cannibalism.

Hamatsi Kwakiutl Indian cannibal spirit

Hamatsi, a Kwakiutl Indian of the cannibal spirit. Feldman.

In a book subtitled A History Forgotten, George Franklin Feldman dispels the parlor concepts and sanitized history surrounding Native American practices and pieces together the frightful truth. It is the only book on its topic:  Cannibalism, Headhunting and Human Sacrifice in North America (Hood:  Chambersburg, 2008), and the author’s work was an uphill battle against political correctness.

Forget about the Donner Party. When anthropologists and explorers first encountered the monuments and ruins of the people politely called the Ancestral Pueblo they found widespread evidence of a cannibalistic society that had gotten out of control and succumbed to its own inhumanity.

“The best documented indication that the Baskemakers were headhunters is . . . Kinboko Canyon, evidence discovered by archeologist Samuel J. Guernsey of the Peabody Museum of Harvard in 1915, and reported in a 1919 publication of the Smithsonian Institution’s Bureau of American Ethnology,” writes Feldman in the chapter on the Anasazi. He goes on to describe this and other early excavations in the Four Corners area that were quickly hushed up and reburied in horror, including Battle Cave in Canyon del Muerto, now part of the Canyon de Chelly National Monument inside the Navajo Indian Reservation. We read now of flesh-stripping, bone crushing, roasting pits, and sliced off mastoids.

Around 950 A.D., eleven persons, including women and children, were killed and butchered, cooked, and eaten on Burnt Mesa in New Mexico north of the San Juan River. At a site near the Hopi villages in Arizona, a group of thirty individuals, forty percent under the age of eighteen, were slaughted and eaten. In a Colorado rock shelter, a large jar was found filled with splintered human bones. . .

The grisly record goes on and on. Feldman writes that by the year 2000 the number of such sites in the San Juan drainage where the Chaco Culture was centered had risen to forty (p. 136).

To their credit, the Indians who were the Chacoans’ food supply eventually overthrew their masters and left the area to settle far away, on the three Hopi mesas in Arizona and along the Rio Grande in new pueblos that survive today such as Taos and San Juan. We suggest that the aristocrats of Chaco may have been subject to degenerative neurological disorders like kuru or mad cow disease. But whether they self-destructed or were destroyed by their subject population, it doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to claim them as ancestors.

Feedback

  Comments: 16

  1. Daniel Mendoza


    Hello,
    I recently did a 23 and me dna test. Since my maternal mother is adopted I was curios of her history. I found out that she was from a long line of B2 branch that traced her to the Anasazi and was excited at 1st and then I read articles like yours and was disturbed. I have 35.6% that trace back to 100% of the Anasazi era. I like the fact that I have Native American blood but I wish I could trace it back to a closer grandparent or something since my mom was adopted.


  2. I did ancestry.com and I was surprise that my 27% Native American was not from Central America where Zi come from, but actually North American natives. I did 23&me and now I am more puzzle than ever I am a descendant of the Anasazi?

    I am confused?!!


    • We do not provide percentages of any ancestry because it is not considered scientific. Our comparisons are all on a forensic similarity basis. We have over 50 American Indian populations, but not Anasazi (which would be ancient DNA anyhow) or Hopi or Pueblo. The closest we have in this region is Arizona – Hualapai and Yavapai Indians (n=52) although we also have several Navajo and Apache populations.


    • Here are our Mexico Indian populations you could match with the DNA Fingerprint Plus: Mexican – Southern Mexico (Guerrero) – Mestizo (n=251)
      Mexico – Baja California – Cochimi Indians (n=25)
      Mexico – Nayarit and Jalisco – Cora (n=64)
      Mexico – Nayarit and Jalisco – Huichol (n=30)
      Mexico – Sonora – Seri Indians (n=29)
      Mexico -Baja California – Kilwa Indians (n=13)
      Mexico (Central) – Nahau – Atocpan or Otomi and Cuetzalan Indians (n=11)
      Mexico (Northern) – Tarahumara or Raramuri Indians (n=5)
      Mexico and U.S. – Cucupa/Cocobah Indians (n = 11)


      • From what I know, the Anasazi were called ancient black alien cannibals. Does that mean as in fallen angels or alien to this land? Hmm.

    • Jacques Bernier


      Native came from the north and down to the south and woman were trade for pieces and friendships. some stay in the North and some when down South that why we have their DNA.

    • Misty Johnson Ussery


      Very interesting I myself have done a DNA test from my heritage I’m part of the Indian European and Meso American and Andene id love to know more about history my eyes are wide open


  3. There are always so called scientists who, in an attempt to rebel against what they deem to be an overly respectful interpretation of ancient native American people, decide to jump to the most shocking convulsions they can, such as saying they were cannibals or sacrificed people for religious reasons. In other words, they were savages. The fact is, even if there was proof that humans were eaten, it’s just an assumption that they were eaten by other humans let alone by members of the same group. For all we know they could have been hunted by predatory animals or attacked by some other migrating group. It could have even been the work of some other species of human like the neanderthal in Europe. Archeology is NOT and exact science, and if you have puebloan blood it is likely you are a descendant of a very amazing group of people who accomplished many great things.


    • While I grant your point, I read the book on cannibalism and the proof involved, among other things, human dentation on gnawed bones as well as the remains of a feast. Cannibalism was a lot more widespread in Mexico, especially under Moctezuma I (c. 1398–1469).


    • Bullshit. The proof was found in the human excrement (shit) that was analyized. They ate humans and sacrified them to false gods/demons. Get your facts straight!!


  4. Do you have data on their ancient DNA? This cannibalism resembles the eating of the king/chief in ancient African or Irish cultures.


    • Hi, You’re right, it could be ritualistic.No one has really investigated. It’s probably against the law to even mention in an anthropology class!


  5. The fed government has buried everything in our history.
    We’ll never know the truth because they don’t want us to know.
    I noticed at beginning of this article Harvard and the Smithsonian is mentioned.
    Both of them working toward burying/falsifying every fact they can….

  6. Stephen L Belanger


    This is accurate, even Navajo elders confirm their cannibalistic tendencies, slave trading, head hunting, etc… It was not just ritualistic. The fact that his book is the sole book on this topic, at least then, and the battle to publish, should speak to the possible veracity of the claims. The info is not that hard to find nor to confirm.

Your feedback