Bigfoot DNA to Be Released: Not What You Think

‘Bigfoot’ DNA Sequenced In Upcoming Genetics Studymelba ketchum
Saturday, November 24th 2012

Five-Year Genome Study At DNA Diagnostics Yields Evidence of
Homo sapiens/Unknown Hominin Hybrid Species in North America

Dallas, TX (PRWEB) November 24, 2012

A team of scientists can verify that their 5-year long DNA study, currently under peer-review, confirms the existence of a novel hominin hybrid species, commonly called “Bigfoot” or “Sasquatch,” living in North America. Researchers’ extensive DNA sequencing suggests that the legendary Sasquatch is a human relative that arose approximately 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species.

The study was conducted by a team of experts in genetics, forensics, imaging and pathology, led by Dr. Melba S. Ketchum of Nacogdoches, TX. In response to recent interest in the study, Dr. Ketchum can confirm that her team has sequenced 3 complete Sasquatch nuclear genomes and determined the species is a human hybrid: “Our study has sequenced 20 whole mitochondrial genomes and
utilized next generation sequencing to obtain 3 whole nuclear
genomes from purported Sasquatch samples . . .   We note that there are also news reports that Sasquatch or Yeti sample analyses are about to be released in Russia, Australia, England and Idaho, and predict that this could be one of those breakthrough revelations in science where the news is broken simultaneously by independent sources.

Photo above:  Dr. Melba Ketchum of DNA Diagnostics. 



Abominable snow manI have read that her FB page is now deleted. I don’t know if that is correct or not, but I had it saved and copied what she said for you. She told her fans yesterday that she has to get this right to be accepted into a peer-reviewed  paper:


Melba Ketchum’s latest Facebook status regarding her DNA paper:


“For everyone that keeps asking for when the paper will be out, please understand that 1) I cannot talk about our data or it will never get published. Those are journal rules. 2) I cannot divulge which journal as that will kill our paper also so speculation is futile. 3) Peer review and publication can take 5 to 26 weeks and then there is the question of revision where they ask you to change or re-write or edit some of the paper. It is a rare paper that is accepted without some revision. I know this because I peer review for some well known scientific journals also. 4) Timing is very difficult to say the least because of #3 and once again, I am sure the journal would reject the paper if I told you exactly when I think the paper would be out. Soon is as much as I can say. I cannot afford to lose all of the exceptionally difficult work that my co-authors and I have put into this project. I am asking you to understand this! Please. 5) I also ask you to understand that I am not trying to be rude or disrespectful to anyone by my silence. I would love nothing better than to scream our results to the world. But, like everything else in the world of Sasquatch, it will NOT prove ANYTHING if the data doesn’t undergo the rigors of peer review in the scientific community. It has to convince the skeptics (or at least skeptical scientists) or it is just another attempt to prove the existence of BF that cannot be substantiated even though we have overkilled the science on this project beyond all realms of reason. So, I guess the question is, do we rush and and fail, or do we play by the rules and prove something once and for all that will vindicate thousands who have had sightings. They are real and most if not all of the people on FB here are believers. Please, let’s do this right so the world will know once and for all that there is a real and illusive creature that is alive and well right here in our own backyards. If I have any news I can share, I will share it here though, OK?”

I hope she does get this out. Fascinating story!

Be the first to write a comment.

Your feedback