If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Most Humans Part Neanderthal

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The bombshell arrived with the May 7, 2010 issue of Science Magazine. Entitled "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome," it presented the years-long attempt of an international team of scientists to derive DNA from ancient female Neanderthal bones and determine if there was any genetic overlap with humans. The news was so sensational that the journal made the original scientific report and all collateral materials free to everyone, along with a podcast, multimedia presentation "The Neandertal Genome" and slew of links and forums for comments.

Read the original press release from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. It was embargoed for May 6, 2010, 8 p.m.

 

Svante Pääbo’s Neanderthal research group from left to right: Adrian Briggs, Hernán Burbano, Matthias Meyer, Anja Buchholz, Jesse Dabney, Kay Prüfer, Svante Pääbo, Janet Kelso, Tomislav Maričić, Qiaomei Fu, Udo Stenzel, Johannes Krause and Martin Kircher. (Copyright: Frank Vinken)

Some background

Discovered in a quarry in Germany in 1856, 40,000-year-old Neanderthal man became the first recognized early human fossil. The debate immediately began whether Neanderthals were a separate species or sub-species of Homo sapiens. German language orthographic reforms rendered the spelling of the name Neandertal in the twentieth century, although most people even today prefer to stick with the th of the original word. Neanderthals are named after the Neander Valley (German thal or tal) in which they first came to light.

More and more of them turned up over the years:  in Belgium (1886), a nearly complete skeleton in southern France (1908), Israel (then-Palestine, 1930) and Iraq (1953). The first ambitious genetic work was a partial sequencing of their mitochondrial DNA based on highly degraded specimens: Krings et al., Cell 90, 19 (1997). A second mitDNA sequence was achieved in 2000. The complete mtDNA sequence came in 2008:  Green et al., Cell 134, 416 (2008).

In the meantime, Neanderthals were found to have red hair and fair skin, body paint, customs, societies, rituals and art. They used fire, tools and weapons. They hunted bison, horses and other large animals and made bread of acorn meal. With their short arms and weak shoulder sockets, however, they probably could not throw spears. Before they were conquered by their smaller human cousins, they had colonized an area extending from Spain to Western Siberia and the Middle East. They were acclimated to northern Europe's icy temperatures and flourished especially before and during the last Ice Age. Then, suddenly, about 30,000 years ago, the fossil record goes silent. Their last holdout appears to have been in Spain.

Our picture of Neanderthals is likely to change radically now that we know they were among ancestors of ours, not a dead-end, primitive race. Some writers had already speculated, in fact, that Neanderthals were more advanced in many ways than their rivals, Cro-Magnon Man. Certainly, their religion was highly adumbrated. Some carried Venus figures on necklaces. According to the author of The Neanderthal's Necklace, Juan Luis Arsuaga (co-director of the World Heritage Site Sierra de Atapuerca in Spain), at one burial in Russia, a 60-year-old adult had 3,000 beads of drilled mammoth ivory sewn onto his clothes. A boy in the same burial wore a belt decorated with 250 arctic fox canines. There were also shells, armbands, head ornaments, bracelets, pendants, assegais, ceremonial staffs and other artifacts made of bone, antler, ivory and stone (p. 294).

The blockbuster draft of the Neanderthal genome just published noted genes linked to cognitive abilities, geo-spatial skills, language and motor coordination as well as strength, reproductive advantages and (what we knew already) cold adaptation. Much attention is likely to focus on the Neanderthal's signature occipital bun, noticed in isolated or vestigial populations like the Berbers, Saami, Canary Islands, Native Americans, Australian Aborigines and Melungeons. These populations probably preserved greater proportions of Neanderthal admixture than others.

Because the genetic legacy of Neanderthals (so far) has not been detected in the mitochondrial record, it is believed that gene flow came from males mating with human females. No male Neanderthal lines survive -- not surprisingly. Only autosomal DNA reveals the Neanderthal contribution to human populations.


Comments

Anonymous commented on 18-May-2010 03:09 PM

This comment is also directed to a Melungeon list and some friends of mine. I have no financial interest in Don's consulting business. He is a cousin/mentor/friend and I have used his services for several items with very satisfying results.

Don sent my Neanderthal Index points to me.

Here is Don's analysis of my RESULTS:

Interpretive Analysis and Result
On an averaged basis for aggregate world populations, the subject’s top matches are Saharawis and other North African populations. The subject, on average, has thirteen times the probability of having genetic relatives in Archaic populations than British and Swedish, the least likely European populations to have Neanderthal admixture. Descending below the top tier matches, other Archaic populations like Native American and Australian Aboriginal are still two to three times stronger than Northern European such as British. Because of high matches with Berbers, India and the Middle East, but lacking strong Finno‐Uralic matches, the subject has an estimated Neanderthal Index of 3.5 or High on a scale of 0.1 to 5.0.

I think this is very interesting. I have a huge occipital bun among other traits. My father's was larger than mine.

Love
Nancy

Joseph Jessup commented on 27-Nov-2012 11:49 AM

Neanderthals did not colonize Europe, they evolved in Europe from Homo Heidelburgensis (advanced H.Erectus) who moved out of Africa. There are no non African forefathers of humans. To assume that is to accept the regional evolutionary model which is not correct. It is the replacement model which is accepted today as the proper theory. Regionalism could not allow such a close convergent evolution..it is not possible even in the most simple of organisms.


Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image

Bookmark and Share

Recent Posts


Tags

England Marija Gimbutas Russell Belk X chromosome Ashkenazi Jews occipital bun rock art Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid seafaring Keros Algonquian Indians Greeks Hohokam Tifaneg Turkic DNA Lab Corp DNA testing companies Kurgan Culture Wales familial Mediterranean fever horizontal inheritance Belgium Middle Ages Daily News and Analysis mutation rate Beringia hominids Chuetas Gypsies European DNA Victor Hugo Tintagel Life Technologies Melba Ketchum The Nation magazine Gravettian culture Roma People Bode Technology Teresa Panther-Yates Clovis Charles Perou rapid DNA testing clan symbols George Starr-Bresette Scotland ethnic markers Khoisan Denisovans oncology Choctaw Indians DNA databases Arabia Leicester French Canadians Harold Sterling Gladwin Anasazi Celts Sasquatch bloviators New York Academy of Sciences genetic determinism archeology Marie Cheng Bigfoot human leukocyte antigens NPR American Journal of Human Genetics Tutankamun Timothy Bestor Arizona State University Phoenicians Cohen Modal Haplotype education Michael Grant Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Discover magazine Virginia DeMarce statistics Italy Native American DNA Roberta Estes Micmac Indians Isabel Allende American history AP genealogy haplogroup E Abenaki Indians George van der Merwede Middle Eastern DNA Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Alabama Freemont Indians Bryan Sykes Thuya New York Review of Books Abraham Lincoln Richard Buckley corn Cornwall Nikola Tesla FBI Patagonia Alec Jeffreys Dienekes Anthropology Blog Albert Einstein College of Medicine climate change Stephen Oppenheimer Science magazine Cajuns Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Pueblo Indians Cave art mitochondrial DNA Horatio Cushman Chris Tyler-Smith African DNA Neolithic Revolution megapopulations Les Miserables Iran N. Brent Kennedy Stacy Schiff haplogroup X Philippa Langley Great Goddess hoaxes Britain Arabic Kate Wong news Cherokee DNA history of science religion Genome Sciences Building Zuni Indians Current Anthropology Russia Melungeon Heritage Association Henriette Mertz Riane Eisler ethics Phoenix epigenetics El Castillo cave paintings Nadia Abu El-Haj breast cancer Akhenaten Oxford Nanopore DNA Fingerprint Test cannibalism King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales BATWING Svante Paabo Mary Settegast Scientific American Terry Gross Ireland Tom Martin Scroft consanguinity Y chromosomal haplogroups National Health Laboratories DNA Fingerprint Test Etruscans Paleolithic Age DNA magazine Charles Darwin Helladic art MHC Maya Mark Thomas population genetics Bentley surname research Richard Lewontin race immunology INORA FOX News autosomal DNA Jon Entine giants Asian DNA GlobalFiler Kentucky Epigraphic Society Barnard College Gila River Neanderthals Jack Goins Gregory Mendel Gunnar Thompson Majorca Richard III polydactylism Applied Epistemology Melanesians research China Pueblo Grande Museum far from the tree prehistory Altai Turks Michael Schwartz forensics John Wilwol Jim Bentley anthropology Colin Renfrew Jone Entine Henry IV French DNA Israel Phillipe Charlier Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Phyllis Starnes University of Leicester Plato Chauvet cave paintings surnames Harold Goodwin Jewish genetics Melungeon Union Barack Obama genomics labs Stone Age Arizona Bryony Jones Bill Tiffee genetics Sarmatians Constantine Rafinesque haplogroup J Telltown Louis XVI Anne Marie Fine cancer pheromones Wendy Roth BBCNews methylation Anglo-Saxons Sorbs PNAS Henry VII Pima Indians Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis North African DNA Panther's Lodge National Geographic Daily News Lebanon Melungeons ethnicity haplogroup T Sinti Zionism Pomponia Graecina Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) Maronites Indo-Europeans Discovery Channel Israel, Shlomo Sand mental foramen Tucson human leukocyte testing Acadians haplogroup N Hohokam Indians palatal tori human migrations ancient DNA Cancer Genome Atlas Caucasian Promega Wikipedia Native American DNA Test microsatellites India Colin Pitchfork Fritz Zimmerman Smithsonian Magazine Holocaust DNA security Population genetics Grim Sleeper Joseph Jacobs Egyptians Europe Nature Communications Columbia University IntegenX haplogroup U Nature Genetics Magdalenian culture HapMap Shlomo Sand Khazars First Peoples Moundbuilders clinical chemistry Cleopatra Sea Peoples Solutreans haplogroup H Peter Parham Rush Limbaugh M. J. Harper Chris Stringer Y chromosome DNA Rare Genes mummies Comanche Indians medicine evolution single nucleotide polymorphism Nova Scotia linguistics Penny Ferguson personal genomics population isolates university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill andrew solomon EURO DNA Fingerprint Test Rutgers University Harry Ostrer myths Jews Navajo haplogroup B Rafael Falk Havasupai Indians Janet Lewis Crain Elizabeth C. Hirschman King Arthur Normans DNA Forums Theodore Steinberg Donald N. Yates Hopi Indians health and medicine Irish history Bradshaw Foundation Sam Kean Basques Eric Wayner Finnish people Salt River North Carolina ISOGG

Archive