If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Most Humans Part Neanderthal

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The bombshell arrived with the May 7, 2010 issue of Science Magazine. Entitled "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome," it presented the years-long attempt of an international team of scientists to derive DNA from ancient female Neanderthal bones and determine if there was any genetic overlap with humans. The news was so sensational that the journal made the original scientific report and all collateral materials free to everyone, along with a podcast, multimedia presentation "The Neandertal Genome" and slew of links and forums for comments.

Read the original press release from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. It was embargoed for May 6, 2010, 8 p.m.

 

Svante Pääbo’s Neanderthal research group from left to right: Adrian Briggs, Hernán Burbano, Matthias Meyer, Anja Buchholz, Jesse Dabney, Kay Prüfer, Svante Pääbo, Janet Kelso, Tomislav Maričić, Qiaomei Fu, Udo Stenzel, Johannes Krause and Martin Kircher. (Copyright: Frank Vinken)

Some background

Discovered in a quarry in Germany in 1856, 40,000-year-old Neanderthal man became the first recognized early human fossil. The debate immediately began whether Neanderthals were a separate species or sub-species of Homo sapiens. German language orthographic reforms rendered the spelling of the name Neandertal in the twentieth century, although most people even today prefer to stick with the th of the original word. Neanderthals are named after the Neander Valley (German thal or tal) in which they first came to light.

More and more of them turned up over the years:  in Belgium (1886), a nearly complete skeleton in southern France (1908), Israel (then-Palestine, 1930) and Iraq (1953). The first ambitious genetic work was a partial sequencing of their mitochondrial DNA based on highly degraded specimens: Krings et al., Cell 90, 19 (1997). A second mitDNA sequence was achieved in 2000. The complete mtDNA sequence came in 2008:  Green et al., Cell 134, 416 (2008).

In the meantime, Neanderthals were found to have red hair and fair skin, body paint, customs, societies, rituals and art. They used fire, tools and weapons. They hunted bison, horses and other large animals and made bread of acorn meal. With their short arms and weak shoulder sockets, however, they probably could not throw spears. Before they were conquered by their smaller human cousins, they had colonized an area extending from Spain to Western Siberia and the Middle East. They were acclimated to northern Europe's icy temperatures and flourished especially before and during the last Ice Age. Then, suddenly, about 30,000 years ago, the fossil record goes silent. Their last holdout appears to have been in Spain.

Our picture of Neanderthals is likely to change radically now that we know they were among ancestors of ours, not a dead-end, primitive race. Some writers had already speculated, in fact, that Neanderthals were more advanced in many ways than their rivals, Cro-Magnon Man. Certainly, their religion was highly adumbrated. Some carried Venus figures on necklaces. According to the author of The Neanderthal's Necklace, Juan Luis Arsuaga (co-director of the World Heritage Site Sierra de Atapuerca in Spain), at one burial in Russia, a 60-year-old adult had 3,000 beads of drilled mammoth ivory sewn onto his clothes. A boy in the same burial wore a belt decorated with 250 arctic fox canines. There were also shells, armbands, head ornaments, bracelets, pendants, assegais, ceremonial staffs and other artifacts made of bone, antler, ivory and stone (p. 294).

The blockbuster draft of the Neanderthal genome just published noted genes linked to cognitive abilities, geo-spatial skills, language and motor coordination as well as strength, reproductive advantages and (what we knew already) cold adaptation. Much attention is likely to focus on the Neanderthal's signature occipital bun, noticed in isolated or vestigial populations like the Berbers, Saami, Canary Islands, Native Americans, Australian Aborigines and Melungeons. These populations probably preserved greater proportions of Neanderthal admixture than others.

Because the genetic legacy of Neanderthals (so far) has not been detected in the mitochondrial record, it is believed that gene flow came from males mating with human females. No male Neanderthal lines survive -- not surprisingly. Only autosomal DNA reveals the Neanderthal contribution to human populations.


Comments

Anonymous commented on 18-May-2010 03:09 PM

This comment is also directed to a Melungeon list and some friends of mine. I have no financial interest in Don's consulting business. He is a cousin/mentor/friend and I have used his services for several items with very satisfying results.

Don sent my Neanderthal Index points to me.

Here is Don's analysis of my RESULTS:

Interpretive Analysis and Result
On an averaged basis for aggregate world populations, the subject’s top matches are Saharawis and other North African populations. The subject, on average, has thirteen times the probability of having genetic relatives in Archaic populations than British and Swedish, the least likely European populations to have Neanderthal admixture. Descending below the top tier matches, other Archaic populations like Native American and Australian Aboriginal are still two to three times stronger than Northern European such as British. Because of high matches with Berbers, India and the Middle East, but lacking strong Finno‐Uralic matches, the subject has an estimated Neanderthal Index of 3.5 or High on a scale of 0.1 to 5.0.

I think this is very interesting. I have a huge occipital bun among other traits. My father's was larger than mine.

Love
Nancy

Joseph Jessup commented on 27-Nov-2012 11:49 AM

Neanderthals did not colonize Europe, they evolved in Europe from Homo Heidelburgensis (advanced H.Erectus) who moved out of Africa. There are no non African forefathers of humans. To assume that is to accept the regional evolutionary model which is not correct. It is the replacement model which is accepted today as the proper theory. Regionalism could not allow such a close convergent evolution..it is not possible even in the most simple of organisms.


Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image

Bookmark and Share

Recent Posts


Tags

Gravettian culture Genome Sciences Building European DNA health and medicine Columbia University Maronites genetics forensics Shlomo Sand human migrations Wendy Roth Celts Rafael Falk Pueblo Grande Museum Science magazine Jim Bentley Applied Epistemology Paleolithic Age John Wilwol Bigfoot Nature Genetics archeology Basques Stacy Schiff Discovery Channel Arizona Navajo EURO DNA Fingerprint Test Current Anthropology DNA magazine Tintagel climate change Life Technologies Thuya Scotland Gunnar Thompson Bill Tiffee Stone Age Kentucky FOX News DNA databases Victor Hugo Wales Plato Kate Wong Abraham Lincoln Native American DNA Altai Turks Charles Darwin Kurgan Culture Maya occipital bun Turkic DNA Caucasian mitochondrial DNA Henry VII China Phillipe Charlier Penny Ferguson Y chromosomal haplogroups Bryony Jones Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Havasupai Indians Arizona State University Henriette Mertz India Irish history Isabel Allende Keros linguistics New York Academy of Sciences Tucson autosomal DNA religion Cornwall Zuni Indians Melungeons Smithsonian Magazine Sinti Tutankamun North Carolina clinical chemistry Chauvet cave paintings Clovis genetic determinism Jack Goins DNA Fingerprint Test Pomponia Graecina Russia Leicester bloviators Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) Salt River Wikipedia Bentley surname research INORA Algonquian Indians cannibalism news Israel Lebanon Middle Ages haplogroup N Melungeon Heritage Association single nucleotide polymorphism Gila River Cohen Modal Haplotype Great Goddess Population genetics Cleopatra Comanche Indians King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales palatal tori Harold Sterling Gladwin Iran Indo-Europeans Mary Settegast Harold Goodwin Pima Indians ethnic markers Asian DNA Arabia Khoisan Gypsies HapMap Rutgers University Cherokee DNA The Nation magazine Anglo-Saxons N. Brent Kennedy Ireland American history Hopi Indians Magdalenian culture clan symbols Roberta Estes ethics Neolithic Revolution Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Sea Peoples Marie Cheng Louis XVI El Castillo cave paintings Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis Egyptians ancient DNA Native American DNA Test Chuetas Chris Stringer Philippa Langley Barnard College Israel, Shlomo Sand Alec Jeffreys Telltown Les Miserables Jon Entine mutation rate IntegenX Hohokam GlobalFiler University of Leicester oncology DNA security methylation Sorbs mummies Oxford Nanopore Janet Lewis Crain Denisovans Richard III Virginia DeMarce Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Svante Paabo North African DNA Melba Ketchum haplogroup H African DNA Neanderthals Elizabeth C. Hirschman M. J. Harper rock art statistics microsatellites Teresa Panther-Yates Dienekes Anthropology Blog Akhenaten Nature Communications Acadians myths Cancer Genome Atlas National Geographic Daily News Eric Wayner haplogroup E history of science population isolates Melanesians Gregory Mendel Britain seafaring surnames Abenaki Indians genomics labs Michael Grant Riane Eisler Grim Sleeper Greeks Helladic art rapid DNA testing Promega Lab Corp Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Rush Limbaugh Terry Gross Phyllis Starnes Peter Parham Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid BATWING DNA Forums Henry IV ISOGG breast cancer Timothy Bestor Barack Obama Russell Belk immunology Marija Gimbutas Hohokam Indians Finnish people genealogy Joseph Jacobs Albert Einstein College of Medicine AP research Fritz Zimmerman Europe French Canadians England Arabic Majorca education Richard Buckley Y chromosome DNA Mark Thomas haplogroup J Solutreans Donald N. Yates Melungeon Union medicine Holocaust Moundbuilders familial Mediterranean fever Colin Renfrew Stephen Oppenheimer French DNA BBCNews horizontal inheritance Richard Lewontin Sasquatch National Health Laboratories cancer American Journal of Human Genetics George van der Merwede Normans DNA Fingerprint Test Beringia Khazars Tom Martin Scroft human leukocyte testing Micmac Indians far from the tree population genetics X chromosome evolution haplogroup T Horatio Cushman George Starr-Bresette megapopulations Michael Schwartz Bryan Sykes andrew solomon Choctaw Indians Patagonia Nikola Tesla Italy Theodore Steinberg PNAS Belgium race First Peoples NPR Sarmatians FBI Daily News and Analysis King Arthur Sam Kean hoaxes hominids pheromones Phoenicians Nadia Abu El-Haj Etruscans Discover magazine prehistory Panther's Lodge giants Bode Technology personal genomics DNA testing companies Colin Pitchfork Alabama Bradshaw Foundation Anne Marie Fine Jewish genetics Jone Entine Scientific American university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Charles Perou corn Ashkenazi Jews Harry Ostrer ethnicity haplogroup U polydactylism Constantine Rafinesque Jews Phoenix Epigraphic Society Freemont Indians anthropology mental foramen Tifaneg Nova Scotia Zionism Cajuns haplogroup B consanguinity Middle Eastern DNA New York Review of Books Chris Tyler-Smith epigenetics Roma People human leukocyte antigens MHC Rare Genes haplogroup X Pueblo Indians Anasazi Cave art

Archive