If you want to discover your genetic history and where you came from... you’ve found the right place!

888-806-2588

review of scientific and news articles on dna testing and popular genetics

Most Humans Part Neanderthal

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The bombshell arrived with the May 7, 2010 issue of Science Magazine. Entitled "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome," it presented the years-long attempt of an international team of scientists to derive DNA from ancient female Neanderthal bones and determine if there was any genetic overlap with humans. The news was so sensational that the journal made the original scientific report and all collateral materials free to everyone, along with a podcast, multimedia presentation "The Neandertal Genome" and slew of links and forums for comments.

Read the original press release from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. It was embargoed for May 6, 2010, 8 p.m.

 

Svante Pääbo’s Neanderthal research group from left to right: Adrian Briggs, Hernán Burbano, Matthias Meyer, Anja Buchholz, Jesse Dabney, Kay Prüfer, Svante Pääbo, Janet Kelso, Tomislav Maričić, Qiaomei Fu, Udo Stenzel, Johannes Krause and Martin Kircher. (Copyright: Frank Vinken)

Some background

Discovered in a quarry in Germany in 1856, 40,000-year-old Neanderthal man became the first recognized early human fossil. The debate immediately began whether Neanderthals were a separate species or sub-species of Homo sapiens. German language orthographic reforms rendered the spelling of the name Neandertal in the twentieth century, although most people even today prefer to stick with the th of the original word. Neanderthals are named after the Neander Valley (German thal or tal) in which they first came to light.

More and more of them turned up over the years:  in Belgium (1886), a nearly complete skeleton in southern France (1908), Israel (then-Palestine, 1930) and Iraq (1953). The first ambitious genetic work was a partial sequencing of their mitochondrial DNA based on highly degraded specimens: Krings et al., Cell 90, 19 (1997). A second mitDNA sequence was achieved in 2000. The complete mtDNA sequence came in 2008:  Green et al., Cell 134, 416 (2008).

In the meantime, Neanderthals were found to have red hair and fair skin, body paint, customs, societies, rituals and art. They used fire, tools and weapons. They hunted bison, horses and other large animals and made bread of acorn meal. With their short arms and weak shoulder sockets, however, they probably could not throw spears. Before they were conquered by their smaller human cousins, they had colonized an area extending from Spain to Western Siberia and the Middle East. They were acclimated to northern Europe's icy temperatures and flourished especially before and during the last Ice Age. Then, suddenly, about 30,000 years ago, the fossil record goes silent. Their last holdout appears to have been in Spain.

Our picture of Neanderthals is likely to change radically now that we know they were among ancestors of ours, not a dead-end, primitive race. Some writers had already speculated, in fact, that Neanderthals were more advanced in many ways than their rivals, Cro-Magnon Man. Certainly, their religion was highly adumbrated. Some carried Venus figures on necklaces. According to the author of The Neanderthal's Necklace, Juan Luis Arsuaga (co-director of the World Heritage Site Sierra de Atapuerca in Spain), at one burial in Russia, a 60-year-old adult had 3,000 beads of drilled mammoth ivory sewn onto his clothes. A boy in the same burial wore a belt decorated with 250 arctic fox canines. There were also shells, armbands, head ornaments, bracelets, pendants, assegais, ceremonial staffs and other artifacts made of bone, antler, ivory and stone (p. 294).

The blockbuster draft of the Neanderthal genome just published noted genes linked to cognitive abilities, geo-spatial skills, language and motor coordination as well as strength, reproductive advantages and (what we knew already) cold adaptation. Much attention is likely to focus on the Neanderthal's signature occipital bun, noticed in isolated or vestigial populations like the Berbers, Saami, Canary Islands, Native Americans, Australian Aborigines and Melungeons. These populations probably preserved greater proportions of Neanderthal admixture than others.

Because the genetic legacy of Neanderthals (so far) has not been detected in the mitochondrial record, it is believed that gene flow came from males mating with human females. No male Neanderthal lines survive -- not surprisingly. Only autosomal DNA reveals the Neanderthal contribution to human populations.


Comments

Anonymous commented on 18-May-2010 03:09 PM

This comment is also directed to a Melungeon list and some friends of mine. I have no financial interest in Don's consulting business. He is a cousin/mentor/friend and I have used his services for several items with very satisfying results.

Don sent my Neanderthal Index points to me.

Here is Don's analysis of my RESULTS:

Interpretive Analysis and Result
On an averaged basis for aggregate world populations, the subject’s top matches are Saharawis and other North African populations. The subject, on average, has thirteen times the probability of having genetic relatives in Archaic populations than British and Swedish, the least likely European populations to have Neanderthal admixture. Descending below the top tier matches, other Archaic populations like Native American and Australian Aboriginal are still two to three times stronger than Northern European such as British. Because of high matches with Berbers, India and the Middle East, but lacking strong Finno‐Uralic matches, the subject has an estimated Neanderthal Index of 3.5 or High on a scale of 0.1 to 5.0.

I think this is very interesting. I have a huge occipital bun among other traits. My father's was larger than mine.

Love
Nancy

Joseph Jessup commented on 27-Nov-2012 11:49 AM

Neanderthals did not colonize Europe, they evolved in Europe from Homo Heidelburgensis (advanced H.Erectus) who moved out of Africa. There are no non African forefathers of humans. To assume that is to accept the regional evolutionary model which is not correct. It is the replacement model which is accepted today as the proper theory. Regionalism could not allow such a close convergent evolution..it is not possible even in the most simple of organisms.


Please tell us what you think

Name, website, and email are optional; if we publish your comment, your name will be shown, and may be linked to your website if provided, but the email you enter will not be published.





Captcha Image

 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

haplogroup N Turkic DNA Arizona Cornwall clinical chemistry Bigfoot Micmac Indians cancer England oncology Harold Sterling Gladwin Melanesians Keros Theodore Steinberg Basques NPR Early Jews and Muslims of England and Wales (book) health and medicine human leukocyte antigens HapMap Penny Ferguson Thuya Lab Corp Finnish people Gypsies Cherokee DNA personal genomics African DNA Neanderthals Majorca Ireland haplogroup J Henry IV surnames Nature Genetics bloviators haplogroup T Sea Peoples Sasquatch Tintagel China AP far from the tree Celts rapid DNA testing Terry Gross DNA Forums Rush Limbaugh Cancer Genome Atlas Holocaust Magdalenian culture Israel Promega Wales Patagonia Applied Epistemology El Castillo cave paintings genomics labs Michael Schwartz Hopi Indians race history of science Cave art Belgium Anasazi Jews Marie Cheng Melungeons mental foramen Peter Parham Fritz Zimmerman anthropology myths mummies Arizona State University Paleolithic Age Phoenicians genetics Kurgan Culture methylation BATWING Chauvet cave paintings Gila River human migrations Hohokam Indians seafaring Bradshaw Foundation Abraham Lincoln corn India Normans PNAS haplogroup E Chromosomal Labs Bode Technology Tutankamun haplogroup H Daily News and Analysis Bill Tiffee university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill clan symbols Stephen Oppenheimer Sorbs Algonquian Indians ISOGG Melungeon Heritage Association Kentucky Khoisan Roberta Estes Genome Sciences Building Tifaneg John Wilwol Horatio Cushman Roma People research Mary Settegast Hohokam George Starr-Bresette Harold Goodwin Tom Martin Scroft single nucleotide polymorphism occipital bun Pima Indians Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Rafael Falk Wikipedia FBI religion French DNA Scientific American haplogroup B Nature Communications Wendy Roth North African DNA education Leicester Nephilim, Fritz Zimmerman Helladic art prehistory Phoenix Russell Belk Bryony Jones Discovery Channel Columbia University climate change genetic determinism microsatellites King Arthur, Tintagel, The Earliest Jews and Muslims of England and Wales Gravettian culture Denisovans Anglo-Saxons Native American DNA Test Henriette Mertz pheromones INORA Kate Wong DNA Fingerprint Test ancient DNA Elizabeth C. Hirschman epigenetics Great Goddess breast cancer Life Technologies Michael Grant human leukocyte testing Nikola Tesla Y chromosome DNA Henry VII Donald N. Yates Navajo familial Mediterranean fever Plato Cajuns Phyllis Starnes polydactylism Bentley surname research news Zionism Cohen Modal Haplotype Colin Pitchfork Phillipe Charlier French Canadians Oxford Nanopore National Health Laboratories Barnard College Neolithic Revolution The Nation magazine Barack Obama Joseph Jacobs Russia Clovis George van der Merwede andrew solomon Bryan Sykes Italy Indo-Europeans M. J. Harper Dienekes Anthropology Blog Melungeon Union Caucasian Europe megapopulations hoaxes Pueblo Grande Museum Grim Sleeper haplogroup X Jon Entine DNA databases population isolates Pomponia Graecina Smithsonian Magazine University of Leicester Albert Einstein College of Medicine DNA magazine Riane Eisler Khazars giants Solutreans Arabia Pueblo Indians horizontal inheritance Charles Darwin mitochondrial DNA Comanche Indians Bode Technology Science Daily, Genome Biol. Evol., Eran Elhaik, Khazarian Hypothesis, Rhineland Hypothesis IntegenX Beringia Mark Thomas Anne Marie Fine Chris Tyler-Smith DNA testing companies Native American DNA Zuni Indians Chris Stringer Louis XVI Jim Bentley Austronesian, Filipinos, Australoid Egyptians ethnic markers Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America Eric Wayner Gregory Mendel Choctaw Indians American history MHC Akhenaten North Carolina Population genetics Nova Scotia EURO DNA Fingerprint Test X chromosome population genetics Janet Lewis Crain Timothy Bestor Rutgers University Current Anthropology Isabel Allende European DNA immunology Stacy Schiff Les Miserables New York Academy of Sciences genealogy Epigraphic Society GlobalFiler ethics Harry Ostrer Sam Kean linguistics Chuetas FOX News Freemont Indians Havasupai Indians Stone Age Alec Jeffreys Constantine Rafinesque King Arthur Abenaki Indians statistics Jack Goins Sinti DNA security Charles Perou archeology Discover magazine Arabic Cleopatra evolution Y chromosomal haplogroups First Peoples Virginia DeMarce DNA Fingerprint Test Shlomo Sand Greeks Panther's Lodge autosomal DNA consanguinity Irish history Etruscans Acadians Maya Melba Ketchum Alabama Jewish genetics Altai Turks Israel, Shlomo Sand Moundbuilders Salt River Richard III Teresa Panther-Yates rock art Scotland haplogroup U Ashkenazi Jews N. Brent Kennedy Jone Entine Lebanon National Geographic Daily News Maronites medicine Richard Buckley hominids American Journal of Human Genetics Middle Ages Tucson Rare Genes palatal tori ethnicity Richard Lewontin Britain forensics Science magazine cannibalism Sarmatians Telltown Nadia Abu El-Haj Gunnar Thompson mutation rate Victor Hugo Marija Gimbutas BBCNews Middle Eastern DNA Asian DNA Svante Paabo New York Review of Books Colin Renfrew Philippa Langley Iran

Archive